Effects of race mixing

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Race research
Race differences
Arguments regarding the existence of races
Race and crime
Race and health
Race and intelligence
Race and intelligence: The genetics or not debate
Countries and intelligence
Race and morphology/physiology
Race and sports
Differential K theory
Human Accomplishment
Other race differences
Related research areas
Boasian anthropology
Contact hypothesis
Effects of race mixing ‎
Ethnic heterogeneity
Genetics denialism
Inbreeding depression and
outbreeding depression
Pathological altruism
Racial genetic interests
Recent African origin of modern humans
Smart fraction
The sociologist's fallacy
White flight
White demographics
divided societies
Affirmative action
Civic nationalism
Contact hypothesis
Effects of race mixing
Ethnic heterogeneity
Hate crime
Islamization and anti-Islamization
Magic dirt
Melting pot
No-go area
Political spectrum
Racial genetic interests
White demographics
White flight

This article describes research on the effects of race mixing. This includes research not only on groups where the parents are from different races, but also on groups where the parents themselves are race mixed.

See the article miscegenation for more general aspects of race mixing (such as historical, legal, demographic).


In general, for characteristics that are affected by a large number of genes (which is likely usually the case), a mixed-race group would be expected to have characteristics that on average are intermediate between those of the averages of the parental/ancestral races.

If the parents/ancestors were atypical compared to their racial average(s), then this would to some degree affect this expectation. However, one factor affecting the relatives of atypical parents may be regression to the mean effects.

There is a widespread belief that race mixing is beneficial by decreasing inbreeding. However, the population size needed to avoid problems caused by inbreeding is small and is even smaller if there is even a small genetic exchange with neighboring groups from the same race. See the article on inbreeding depression.

Instead, there may be increased risks of negative effects for both children and parents, caused by factors such as

  • Genetic outbreeding depression.
  • Increased risk of relationship problems (including violence and homicide) in interracial relationships.[1]
  • Identity problems for mixed-race children by not belonging to any racial group.
  • Social isolation for mixed-race children by not belonging to any racial group.
  • Disapproval by society or specific groups against interracial relationships. For example, many Jewish individuals, organizations and the state of Israel actively oppose, campaign against, and prohibit Jews from marrying non-Jews.[2]
  • Genetic similarity theory predicts that the parents and other relatives of mixed-race children will feel less close to the mixed-race children. It also predicts that other persons belonging to the races of the parents will feel less close the mixed-race children. In turn, mixed-race children are predicted to will feel less close to their parents, other relatives, and to other persons belonging to the races of the parents. This may cause various problems for the children, the parents, and others.

Extensive race mixing is one proposed explanation for the fall of many civilizations due to dysgenic effects.[3][4]

Even if there were no dysgenic effects from race mixing, for society large scale race mixing may still cause problems, due to factors such as the appearance of new mixed race groups that may feel more or less alienated from their ancestral races. This may increase the ethnic heterogeneity in a society and associated negative societal effects.

Race mixing may be especially problematic for societies where the predominant race is a high K race (see the article about the Differential K theory) with a high degree of altruism and a consequent extensive welfare system. This means that immigrant race mixers from a low K race may have many children without having to support the children themselves and who are instead supported by the welfare systems. (Immigrants from low K races may also have many children within their own group and who are supported by welfare systems paid for by the high K race.)

From the viewpoint of transmitting a parent's genetics to the next generation, mixed race children will transmit less. This since a co-parent from another race will have more dissimilar genetics than a co-parent from the same race. For example, the measured genetic differences between human races is argued to imply that a White English parent will in relative terms be almost twice as closely related to a child with a White English co-parent as to a mixed race child with a Black Bantu co-parent. In terms of the genetic interests of a parent, this is argued to imply that having a non mixed child is almost the equivalent to having twice the number of such mixed race children. Another stated example is that a parent will be genetically closer to an average (and in some cases to every) individual of the parent's own race than to the parent's own mixed race child with a co-parent from a genetically distant race.[5][6][7]

United States

Intimate partner violence

A 1989 study stated that the risk of spouse homicide was 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages relative to intraracial marriages, that the risk for White wives was 12.4 times higher in interracial marriages, and that the risk for White husbands was 21.4 times higher in interracial marriages.[1]

The Council of Conservative Citizens has furthermore argued that the above understates the risk for in particular White females. This since research found many cases of White females being killed by other Blacks while being in the company of a Black boyfriend, many cases of White females dying of drug overdoses while they did drugs with Black males, or otherwise dying because of "accidents". In addition, there were many stated cases of Black boyfriends killing family members or close friends. About half of these were young children of a mother who was dating a Black male.[8][9]

A 2009 study stated that Black men in interethnic relationships were more likely than Black men in intra-ethnic relationships to perpetrate acts of partner violence.[10]

A 2010 study stated that interracial couples had a higher risk for intimate partner violence, including intimate partner violence causing physical injury and/or arrest, than both ethnic minority and White couples.[11]

A 2012 study stated that the prevalence rate for any occurrence of intimate partner violence was highest for interethnic couples. Interethnic couples also had more severe intimate partner violence. Male partners in interethnic couples had higher rates of binge drinking and alcohol problems compared to male partners in intra-ethnic couples.[12]

A 2013 study stated that interracial couples demonstrated a higher level of intimate partner violence (including mutual intimate partner violence) than monoracial white couples and a level similar to monoracial black couples.[13]

Other studies on interracial relationships

A 2005 study stated that "Interracial marriage is associated with increases in severe distress for Native American men, white women, and for Hispanic men and women married to non-white spouses, compared to endogamous members of the same groups. Higher rates of distress are observed for intermarried persons with African American or Native American husbands or wives, and for women with Hispanic husbands."[14]

A 2008 study stated that "Partners in interethnic unions generally reported lower levels of relationship quality than did partners in same-ethnic unions. These differences held for women as well as men, and for married as well as cohabiting couples. Differences in relationship quality were largely accounted for by more complex relationship histories, more heterogamous unions, fewer shared values and less support from parents. In contrast, differences in socioeconomic resources did not appear to play an explanatory role."[15]

A 2011 study found that "nonblack individuals with black partners have significantly more depressive symptoms and less relationship satisfaction than their counterparts with nonblack partners, regardless of respondent race and whether the nonblack partner is the same versus a different race from the respondent. Further, the relationship between partner race and depressive symptoms is partially and significantly mediated by relationship satisfaction."[16]

A 2012 survey, which also reviewed earlier studies, stated that interracial marriages in general have a greater risk for divorce. White females/Non-White males had the highest risk.[17]

A 2017 study found that images of interracial couples caused a neural disgust response among observers with activation of a brain region associated with disgust. The study stated that "although most of the extant evidence suggests that people in the U.S. are explicitly accepting of interracial romance (e.g., Wang, 2012), our findings suggest that there may still be considerable affective and implicit bias against interracial couples [...] challenges the notion that bias against interracial relationships is largely a thing of the past. Overall, the current research provides evidence that bias against interracial romance is associated with disgust, that interracial couples actually elicit a disgust response among observers, and that these feelings of disgust translate into dehumanization of interracial couples. The current findings provide evidence that interracial couples are implicitly dehumanized, such that they are less readily associated with the category “human” than same-race couples (and more readily associated with the category “animal”). These findings are meaningful given the negative consequences associated with dehumanization, most notably, antisocial behaviors such as aggression and perpetration of violence."[18]

Mixed-race individuals

The "National Household Survey on Drug Abuse" in 1999 stated that of the major racial/ethnic groups, drug use was highest among those reporting to be mixed race.[19]

A 2002 study stated that "Mean levels of three characteristics—verbal IQ, number of sexual partners, and birth weight—were examined in African American, White (European-descent) Americans, and Black/White mixed race American adolescents. The sample came from Wave 1 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The mean age was 16 years. According to their interviewers, the mixed race children had an African American physical appearance. The African American adolescents had a lower birth weight, a lower verbal IQ, and a higher number of sexual partners than did White adolescents. For each characteristic, the mixed race mean fell between the means of the two parental populations."[20]

A 2003 study stated that most earlier studies on mixed-race adolescents had found increased risk for emotional, health, and behavior problems. The most common suggested explanation was identity problems, leading to lack of self-esteem, social isolation, and family problems in mixed-race households. The study stated that it was the first using a large, nationally representative sample. Compared with non-mixed adolescents, the mixed race adolescents often had increased risk for various health problems, substance abuse problems, and behavior problems. While there were differences between different mixed race groups, there was a generally increased risk for all race combinations for most risks.[21]

A 2006 study found increased risks for multiracial adolescents for various problems, including violent behaviors.[22]

Another 2006 study which examined behavioral health found that multiracial Hispanics/Latino adolescents and multiracial non-Hispanic adolescents had more behavioral health problems than monoracial Hispanic adolescents.[23]

A 2008 study stated that "Over the past 40 years the fraction of mixed race black-white births has increased nearly nine-fold. [...] As one might expect, on a host of background and achievement characteristics, mixed race adolescents fall in between whites and blacks. When it comes to engaging in risky/anti-social adolescent behavior, however, mixed race adolescents are stark outliers compared to both blacks and whites. [...] Mixed race adolescents -- not having a natural peer group -- need to engage in more risky behaviors to be accepted."[24]

A 2008 study of Chinese-Caucasian, Filipino-Caucasian, Japanese-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals found that biracial Asian Americans were twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.[25]

United Kingdom

A 2014 UK study stated that mixed-race children and young people had greater risk for mental health issues, due to poor self-esteem, hostile and rejecting relationships, and the experience of discrimination from both Black and White peers. They were over-represented in the youth justice system, in the child protection system, and in the looked after system.[26]


A 2014 Dutch study found that mixed marriages between Dutch and Muslims had no effect on their friends and families cultural views and therefore did not lead to "integration of minority groups". The researcher stated that "It is a false hope to think mixed marriages bring different groups in the population closer together" and "A mixed marriage rarely leads to emotional ties between the two partners’ families and friends". Furthermore, "The family relationships are rarely harmonious" with various cultural conflicts within the relationship and between relatives.[27]

South Korea

A 2005 article stated that mixed race individuals in South Korea often had poorer educational outcomes, difficulty getting a job, often worked as day laborers, had difficulties in dating, had higher risk for criminality, and that 40% had attempted suicide. One stated explanation was racism by Koreans.[28]

Latin America

IQ and associations
with social outcomes
Countries and intelligence:
Associations with other variables
Countries and intelligence:
Within-country regions
Dysgenics: Pessimism regarding
the future of Western civilization
Effects of race mixing:
Latin America
Intelligence quotient:
Social outcomes
Race and intelligence:
Historical societies
Race and intelligence:
Modern societies
Smart fraction
The Bell Curve: Tables
A higher degree of European ancestry in American countries is associated with higher achievement test scores according to a 2014 analysis using genetic data.[29]
A higher degree of Amerindian ancestry in Mexican districts is associated with lower achievement test scores according to a 2014 analysis using genetic data.[30]

Latin America (and also the parts of the Caribbean speaking non-Latin languages) has had extensive race mixing. There is a marked racial hierarchy, with individuals and groups having a lighter skin color usually have higher socioeconomic status as well having higher average results on many other beneficial statistical variables. This has been argued to be the most important social structure and to be more important than traditional classes.[31]

Such a racial hierarchy still exists in Communist Cuba, despite large scale attempts to eradicate it through forced measures.[31]

Haiti has been ruled by Blacks for two centuries and few Whites have lived in the country. Despite this, there is still a racial hierarchy, with Mulattoes usually having a higher socioeconomic status than Blacks.[31] See also the article on Haiti regarding mass killing/genocide of both Whites and Mulattoes by Blacks.

Whites are only a few percent of the population in many other countries in the Caribbean, which has been argued to make it difficult to claim that Whites could politically oppress the other parts of the population. East Asians have never had any political power, often arrived as indentured laborers, but today usually have a high socioeconomic status like Whites.[31]

Residential racial segregation. even if the groups have similar income, is common in, for example, Brazil and also between Blacks and Mulattoes.[31]

A 2014 article found 31 genetic admixture studies which reported, for individuals residing in the Americas, associations between continental ancestry (e.g., European, Amerindian, Sub-Saharan African, East Asian, and Pacific Islander) and some index of educational attainment or socioeconomic status. None of the associations went in a direction opposite to that predicted by the average IQ scores of the ancestral populations. The results were argued to "support a racial hereditarian hypothesis along with others that predict a fairly internationally consistent association between continental ancestry and cognitively correlated indices of socioeconomic status such as education, income, and job prestige".[32]

A 2016 study "conducted novel analyses regarding the association between continental racial ancestry, cognitive ability and socioeconomic outcomes across 6 datasets: states of Mexico, states of the United States, states of Brazil, departments of Colombia, sovereign nations and all units together. We find that European ancestry is consistently and usually strongly positively correlated with cognitive ability and socioeconomic outcomes. [...] It was found that the effect of European ancestry on socioeconomic outcomes was mostly mediated by cognitive ability (Section 13). We failed to find evidence of international colorism or culturalism (i.e., neither skin reflectance nor self-reported race/ethnicity showed incremental predictive ability once genomic ancestry had been taken into account) (Section 14). The association between European ancestry and cognitive outcomes was robust across a number of alternative measures of cognitive ability (Section 15)."[33]

Another 2016 study extended the previous analysis to the United States.[34]

See also the articles on specific countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Haiti, Mexico, and Venezuela.

South Africa

In South Africa, the term "Coloured" refers to a mixed race group with heterogeneous origins. The group has been stated to usually be intermediate between the Black and White populations on many statistical variables, but to deviate from this regarding certain variables, such as regarding the frequency of homicide, which has been stated to be the highest of any racial group in South Africa.[31]

One explanation for this is that "Coloured" feel alienated from both the Black and the White populations and join criminal gangs partly in order to get a sense of belonging.[35]

See also

External links

Article archive


  1. 1.0 1.1 Mercy JA, Saltzman LE (1989) Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1976-85. Am J Public Health 79 (5):595-9. http://pubmed.gov/2705594
  2. Israel’s “Jews-Only” Marriage Laws Explained. October 9, 2013 at 7:10 am.http://davidduke.com/israels-jews-only-marriage-laws-explained/
  3. Donald I. Templer. The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries. Mankind Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Spring 2010) pp. 188-209 http://www.mankindquarterly.org/spring2010_templer.html
  4. Richard D. Fuerle. Chapter 29 - Miscegenation. Erectus Walks Amongst Us. Spooner Press, NY. 2008. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap29.html
  5. What We Owe Our People https://www.amren.com/news/2017/11/what-we-owe-our-people/
  6. Biological Problems with Mixed-Race Families, Marriages Relationships & Adoptions. Sunday, October 16, 2011. http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html
  7. Chapter 7 - Genetic Distance. Erectus Walks Amongst US. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap7.html
  8. What conclusions can be drawn from these 300+ murders. Council of Conservative Citizens. http://conservative-headlines.com/2014/12/what-conclusions-can-be-drawn-from-these-300-murders/
  9. Memorial Wall 2014. Council of Conservative Citizens. http://conservative-headlines.com/2015/02/our-black-on-white-murder-study-has-shocked-even-us/
  10. Hattery AJ. Intimate Partner Violence. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; Lanham, MD: 2009.
  11. Rachel A. Fusco. Intimate Partner Violence in Interracial Couples: A Comparison to White and Ethnic Minority Monoracial Couples. J Interpers Violence October 2010 vol. 25 no. 10 1785-1800. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354510 http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/25/10/1785
  12. Karen G. Chartier and Raul Caetano. Intimate Partner Violence and Alcohol Problems in Interethnic and Intra-ethnic Couples. J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jun; 27(9): 1780–1801. Published online 2011 Dec 26. doi: 10.1177/0886260511430392 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315595/
  13. Martin BA, Cui M, Ueno K, Fincham FD (2013) Intimate Partner Violence in Interracial and Monoracial Couples. Fam Relat 61 (1):202-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00747.x http://pubmed.gov/23554541
  14. Bratter, Jenifer and Karl Eschbach, 2006. "What about the Couple? Interracial Marriage and Psychological Distress" Social Science Research 35(4): 1025-1047. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X05000438
  15. Hohmann-Marriott BE, Amato P. Relationship Quality in Interethnic Marriages and Cohabitations. Social Forces. 2008;87(2):825–855. http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/87/2/825.abstract
  16. Kroeger RA, Williams K (2011) Consequences of black exceptionalism? Interracial unions with blacks, depressive symptoms, and relationship satisfaction. Sociol Q 52 (3):400-20. http://pubmed.gov/22081799
  17. The Rise of Intermarriage. February 16, 2012. Pew Research. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/
  18. Skinner, A. L., & Hudac, C. M. (2017). “Yuck, you disgust me!” Affective bias against interracial couples. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 68-77. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116300555
  19. Who Are America's Drug Users? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/buyers/whoare.html
  20. IQ, Birth Weight, and Number of Sexual Partners in White, African American, and Mixed Race Adolescents https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1016313718644?LI=true
  21. Udry JR, Li RM, Hendrickson-Smith J (2003) Health and behavior risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity. Am J Public Health 93 (11):1865-70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
  22. Choi Y, Harachi TW, Gillmore MR, Catalano RF (2006) Are multiracial adolescents at greater risk? Comparisons of rates, patterns, and correlates of substance use and violence between monoracial and multiracial adolescents. Am J Orthopsychiatry 76 (1):86-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.86 http://pubmed.gov/16569131
  23. Whaley AL, Francis K (2006) Behavioral health in multiracial adolescents: the role of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Public Health Rep 121 (2):169-74. http://pubmed.gov/16528950
  24. Roland G. Fryer, Jr, Lisa Kahn, Steven D. Levitt, Jörg L. Spenkuch. The Plight of Mixed Race Adolescents. NBER Working Paper No. 14192. Issued in July 2008. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14192
  25. Biracial Asian Americans and Mental Health. August 18, 2008. http://news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=8732
  26. Challenges face mixed raced children and young people in the UK today. National Children's Bureau. http://www.ncb.org.uk/news/challenges-face-mixed-raced-children-and-young-people-in-the-uk-today
  27. Steve Goode. Dutch study: White-Muslim marriages don’t assimilate either group. October 8, 2014. http://whitegenocideproject.com/dutch-study-white-muslim-marriages-dont-assimilate-either-group/
  28. Biracial People Face Discrimination in Korea. Kim Rahn, Korea Times (Seoul), May 20, 2005. http://www.amren.com/news/2005/05/biracial_people/
  29. John Fuerst ("Chuck"). (2014, November 03). Racial Ancestry in the Americas. Part 2: Cognitive Variation between Nations: Parasite Load, Climate, and Ancestry. http://humanvarieties.org/2014/11/03/racial-ancestry-in-the-americas-part-2-cognitive-variation-between-nations-parasite-load-climate-and-ancestry/
  30. John Fuerst ("Chuck"). (2014, October 15). District-Level Variation in Continental Racial Admixture Predicts Outcomes in Mexico. http://humanvarieties.org/2014/10/15/district-level-variation-in-continental-racial-admixture-predicts-outcomes-in-mexico/
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 Lynn, Richard. The global bell curve: Race, IQ, and inequality worldwide. Washington Summit Publishers, 2008.
  32. John Fuerst ("Chuck"). (2014, October 03). Is there no population genetic ‘support’ for a racial hereditarian hypothesis?. http://humanvarieties.org/2014/10/03/is-there-no-population-genetic-support-for-a-racial-hereditarian-hypothesis/
  33. John Fuerst and Emil O. W. Kirkegaard. (2016). Admixture in the Americas: Regional and National Differences. Mankind Quarterly. Volume 56, No. 3, Spring, 2016. http://www.mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/56-3/2
  34. Kirkegaard, E. O. & Fuerst, J. (2016). Inequality in the United States: Ethnicity, Racial Admixture and Environmental Causes. Mankind Quarterly 56(4). http://www.mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/56-4/7
  35. Dissel, A. (1997). Youth, Street Gangs and Violence in South Africa. In Youth, Street Culture and Urban Violence in Africa. Proceedings of the international symposium held in Abidjan, 5-7 May. http://www.csvr.org.za/index.php/publications/1540-youth-street-gangs-and-violence-in-south-africa.html