Human evolution

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Human evolution theory
Louis Leakey examining skulls from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania; The possible backwards hybridization between negroes and bonobos is found in genetic data.[1][2]

Human evolution is about the origin of the species of human beings. The term 'human' in this context means the genus Homo. However, studies of human evolution usually include other hominids, such as the Australopithecines, from which the genus Homo had diverged (split) by about 2.3 to 2.4 million years ago, some state in Africa.[3][4] The first Homo sapiens, the ancestors of today's humans, evolved around 200,000 years ago.[5]

It was known for centuries that man and the apes were related. At heart, their anatomy is similar, despite many superficial differences. This was the reason why Buffon and Linnaeus, in the 18th century, put them together in one family. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution says that such basic structural similarity comes from the common origin of the group. The apes and man are close relatives, and are primates: the order of mammals which includes monkeys, apes, lemurs and tarsiers.

The great apes live in tropical rainforests. It is thought that human evolution started when a group of apes began to live more in the savannah. Savannah is more open, with trees, shrubs and grass. This group, the australopithecines, started walking on two legs. They began to use their hands to carry things. Life in the open was different, and there was a big advantage in having better brains. Their brains grew larger, and they began to make simple tools. This began at least 5 million years ago. We have fossils of two or three different groups of walking apes, and one was the ancestor of humans.

The biological name for "human" or "man" is Homo. The modern human species is called Homo sapiens. "Sapiens" means "thought". Homo sapiens means "the thinking man".

Paleoanthropology looks at ancient human fossils, tools, and other signs of early human life. It began in the 19th century with the discovery of a skull of "Neanderthal man" in 1856.

Humans are similar to great apes

Replica of fossil skull of Homo habilis. Fossil number KNM ER 1813, found at Koobi Fora, Kenya
Replica of fossil skull of Homo ergaster (African Homo erectus). Fossil number Khm-Heu 3733 discovered in 1975 in Kenya
Shows similarities of apes and man. The human skeleton is on the right. Figures are drawn to scale, but the gibbon, on the left, is drawn at double size

By 1859, zoologists had known for a long time that humans were, in their anatomy, similar to the great apes. There were also differences: humans can speak, for example. But the similarities were more basic than the differences. Humans also have features with a much older history, from early in the life of vertebrates.[6]

The idea that species were the result of evolution had been proposed before Darwin, but his book gave much evidence, and many were persuaded by it. The book was On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, published in November 1859. In this book, Darwin wrote about the idea of evolution in general, rather than the evolution of humans. Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history, was all Darwin wrote on the subject. Nevertheless, the implications of the theory were clear to readers at the time.[7]

Different people discussed the evolution of humans. Among them were Thomas Huxley and Charles Lyell. Huxley convincingly illustrated many of the similarities and differences between humans and apes in his 1863 book Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. When Darwin published his own book on the subject, The Descent of Man, and selection in relation to sex, the idea of human evolution was already well-known. The theory was controversial. Even some of Darwin's supporters (such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell) did not like the idea that human beings have evolved their impressive mental capacities and moral sensibilities through natural selection.

Since the 18th century, scientists thought the great apes to be closely related to human beings. In the 19th century, they speculated that the closest living relatives of humans were either chimpanzees or gorillas. Both live in central Africa in tropical rainforests. It turns out that the chimpanzee species are closest to us.[8] Biologists believed that humans share a common ancestor with other African great apes and that fossils of these ancestors would be found in Africa, which they have been. It is now accepted by many biologists that humans are not only similar to the great apes, but actually are great apes. Others object this theory.

The issue was finally settled in modern times by studies on the sequences of proteins and genes in apes and man. These studies showed that man shares about 98/99% of these structures with chimpanzees.[9] This is a much closer relationship than with any other type of animal, and fully supports the ideas put forward in the 19th century by Darwin and Huxley.

"Currently available genetic and archaeological evidence is generally interpreted as supportive of a recent single origin of modern humans in East Africa. However, this is where the near consensus on human settlement history ends, and considerable uncertainty clouds any more detailed aspect of human colonization history".[10]

Distinguishing features

Primates have diversified in habitats such as trees and bushes. They have many features which are adaptations to this environment.[11] Here are some of those traits:

  • Shoulder joints which allow high degrees of movement in all directions.[11]
  • Five digits on the fore and hind limbs with opposable thumbs and big toes; hands can grasp, and usually big toes as well.[11]
  • Nails on the fingers and toes (in most species).[12]
  • Sensitive tactile pads on the ends of the digits.[11]
  • Sockets of eyes encircled in bone.[13]
  • A trend towards a reduced snout and flattened face, attributed to a reliance on vision at the expense of smell.[13]
  • A complex visual system with binocular (stereoscopic) vision, high visual acuity and color vision.[11]
  • Brain with a well developed cerebellum for good balance.[13]
  • Brain large in comparison to body size, especially in simians (old world monkeys and apes).[11]
  • Enlarged cerebral cortex (brain): learning, problem solving.[11]
  • Reduced number of teeth compared to primitive mammals;.[11]
  • A well-developed cecum: vegetable digestion.[13]
  • Two pectoral mammary glands.[11]
  • Typically one young per pregnancy.[11]
  • A pendulous penis and scrotal testes.[13]
  • Long gestation and developmental period.[11] and
  • A trend towards holding the torso upright leading to bipedalism.[11]

Not all primates have these anatomical traits, nor is every trait unique to primates. Primates are frequently highly social, live in groups with 'flexible dominance hierarchies'.[14][15]

Other similarities

A chart showing different types of the genus homo, classified by where they lived, and when they lived

Closely related animals almost always have closely related parasites. This usually comes about because parasites evolve with their hosts, and when host populations split, their parasites split also.[16] It is also possible for parasites to get from one species to another. Two of the most serious parasitic infections of humans in Africa have originated in apes. Each may have been transferred to humans by a single cross-species event.

There are several species of mosquito, and several species of the malarial parasite Plasmodium. The most serious type, P. falciparum, which kills many millions of people each year, originated in gorillas.[17] It is now virtually certain that chimpanzees are the source of HIV-1, the major cause of AIDS.[18] This information is got by the sequence analysis of ape and human viruses.

The relevance of this to evolution is that our physiology is so close to the apes that their parasites were able to transfer to humans with great success. Humans have much less resistance to these parasites, which are ancient in origin, but comparatively new to our species.

Immediate ancestors of the genus Homo

A cast of the cranium of "Tournai", Sahelanthropus tchadensis, a member of an extinct hominid species who lived about 7 million years ago
A reconstruction of Australopithecus afarensis

It was not until the 1920s that hominid fossils were discovered in Africa. In 1924, Raymond Dart described Australopithecus africanus.[19] The specimen was called the Taung Child, an australopithecine infant discovered in a cave deposit being mined for concrete at Taung, South Africa. The remains were a remarkably well-preserved tiny skull and a cast of the inside of the individual's skull. Although the brain was small (410 cm³), its shape was rounded, unlike that of chimpanzees and gorillas, and more like a modern human brain. Also, the specimen had short canine teeth, and the position of the foramen magnum was evidence of bipedal locomotion.[20] All of these traits convinced Dart that the Taung baby was a bipedal human ancestor, a transitional form between apes and humans.

It took another 20 years before Dart's claims were taken seriously. This was after other similar skeletons had been found. The most common view of the time was that a large brain evolved before bipedality, the ability to walk on two feet more or less upright. It was thought that intelligence similar to that of modern humans was necessary for bipedalism. This turned out to be wrong: bipedality came first.

The australopithecines are now thought to be immediate ancestors of the genus Homo, the group to which modern humans belong.[21] Both australopithecines and Homo sapiens are part of the tribe Hominini, but recent data has brought into doubt the position of A. africanus as a direct ancestor of modern humans; it may well have been a cousin.[22] The australopithecines were originally classified as either gracile or robust. The robust variety of Australopithecus has since been reclassified as Paranthropus, although it is still regarded as a subgenus of Australopithecus by some authors.[23]

In the 1930s, when the robust specimens were first described, the Paranthropus genus was used. During the 1960s, the robust variety was moved into Australopithecus. The recent trend has been back to the original classification as a separate genus.

The genus Homo

It was Carolus Linnaeus who chose the name Homo. Today, there is only one species in the genus: Homo sapiens. There were other species, but they became extinct.

The figure shows where some of them lived and at what time. Some of the other species might have been ancestors of H. sapiens. Many were likely our "cousins", they developed away from our ancestral line.[24]

Anthropologists are still investigating the exact line of descent. A consensus on which should count as separate species and which as subspecies has not been reached yet. In some cases this is because there are very few fossils, in other cases it is due to the slight differences used to classify species in the Homo genus.

The evolution of the genus Homo took place mostly in the Pleistocene. The whole genus is characterised by its use of stone tools, initially crude, and becoming ever more sophisticated. So much so that in archaeology and anthropology the Pleistocene is usually referred to as the Palaeolithic, or the Stone Age.[25][26]

Homo habilis

Homo habilils was likely the first species of Homo. It developed from the Australopithecus, about 2.5 million years ago. It lived until about 1.4 million years ago. It had smaller molars (back teeth) and larger brains than the Australopithecines.

Towards Homo erectus

There are two proposed species that lived from 1.9 to 1.6 million years ago. Their relation has not been clarified. One of them is called Homo rudolfensis. It is known from a single incomplete skull from Kenya. Scientists have suggested that this was just another habilis, but this has not been confirmed.[27] The other is currently called Homo georgicus. It is from Georgia and may be an intermediate form between H. habilis and H. erectus,[28] or a sub-species of H. erectus.[29]

Homo ergaster and Homo erectus

Homo erectus was first discovered on the island of Java in Indonesia, in 1891. The discoverer, Eugene Dubois originally called it Pithecanthropus erectus based on its morphology that he considered to be intermediate between that of humans and apes.[30] Homo erectus lived lived from about 1.8 million to 70,000 years ago. The earlier specimens (from 1.8 to 1.2 million years ago) are sometimes seen as a different species, or a subspecies. called Homo ergaster, or Homo erectus ergaster'.

In the Early Pleistocene, 1.5–1 mya, in Africa, Asia, and Europe, presumably, some populations of Homo habilis evolved larger brains and made more elaborate stone tools; these differences and others are sufficient for anthropologists to classify them as a new species, H. erectus. In addition H. erectus was the first human ancestor to walk truly upright.[31] This was made possible by the evolution of locking knees and a different location of the foramen magnum (the hole in the skull where the spine enters). They may have used fire to cook their meat.

A famous example of Homo erectus is Peking Man; others were found in Asia (notably in Indonesia), Africa, and Europe. Many paleoanthropologists are now using the term Homo ergaster for the non-Asian forms of this group. They reserve H. erectus only for those fossils found in the Asian region that meet certain requirements (as to skeleton and skull) which differ slightly from ergaster.

Neanderthal Man

Homo neaderthalensis (usually called Neanderthal man) lived from about 250,000 to about 30,000 years ago. Also, less usual, as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis: there is still some discussion if it was a separate species Homo neanderthalensis, or a subspecies of H. sapiens.[32] While the debate remains unsettled, evidence from mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal DNA sequencing indicates that little or no gene flow occurred between H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens, and, therefore, the two were separate species.[33] In 1997, Dr. Mark Stoneking, then an associate professor of anthropology at Pennsylvania State University, stated:

"These results [based on mitochondrial DNA extracted from Neanderthal bone] indicate that Neanderthals did not contribute mitochondrial DNA to modern humans… Neanderthals are not our ancestors".

More investigation of a second source of Neanderthal DNA supported these findings.[34]

A third species

A genetic analysis of a piece of finger bone found in Siberia has produced a surprise result. It dates to about 40,000 years ago, at a time when Neanderthals and modern man were living in the area. German researchers found its mitochondrial DNA did not match either that of our species or that of Neanderthals. If this result is correct, the bone belongs to a previously unknown species. The degree of difference in the DNA suggests this species split off from our family tree about a million years ago, well before the split between our species and Neanderthals.[35]

Homo floresiensis

Homo floresiensis, which lived about 100,000–12,000 years ago has been nicknamed hobbit for its small size. Its size may be a result of island dwarfism, the tendency for large mammals to evolve smaller forms on islands.[36] H. floresiensis is intriguing both for its size and its age. It is a concrete example of a recent species of the genus Homo that shows derived traits not shared with modern humans. In other words, H. floresiensis share a common ancestor with modern humans, but split from the modern human lineage and followed a different evolutionary path. The main find was a skeleton believed to be a woman of about 30 years of age. Found in 2003 it has been dated to approximately 18,000 years old. The living woman was estimated to be one meter in height, with a brain volume of just 380 cm3 This is small for a chimpanzee and less than a third of the H. sapiens average of 1400 cm3.

There is an ongoing debate over whether H. floresiensis is indeed a separate species.[37] Some scientists believe that H. floresiensis was a modern H. sapiens suffering from pathological dwarfism.[38] Modern humans who live on Flores, the island where the skeleton was found, are pygmies. This fact is consistent with either theory. One line of attack on H. floresiensis is that it was found with tools only associated with H. sapiens.[38]

Human arrival on Flores

Stone artefacts have now been found on Flores which can be dated to a million years ago. These artefacts are proxies; which means there were no skeletons of humans, but only a species of Homo could have made the artefacts. The artefacts are flakes and other implements, 48 in all, some of which show signs of being worked to produce a cutting edge. This means that humans were present on Flores by that date, but it does not tell us which species that was.[39]

Homo sapiens

Homo sapiens has lived from about 250,000 years ago to the present. Between 400,000 years ago and the second warm period in the Middle Pleistocene, around 250,000 years ago, its skull grew and more sophisticated technologies based on stone tools developed. One possibility is that a transition between H. erectus to H. sapiens occurred. The evidence of Java Man suggests there was an initial migration of H. erectus out of Africa. Then, much later, a further development of H. sapiens from H. erectus in Africa. Then a subsequent migration within and out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier H. erectus.

Out of Africa theory (Afrocentrism)

Main article: Out of Africa

In the Descent of Man, Charles Darwin proposed that hominins descended out of Africa. Considering the relatively few fossils available at the time, it is a testament to Darwin’s astuteness that his hypothesis remains the leading theory. Since Darwin’s time, we have unearthed many more fossils and discovered new evidence in genetics. As such, our African-origin story has undergone many updates and revisions since 1871. Today, it has splintered into two theories: the “out of Africa” theory and the “multi-regional” theory.

Studies of the human genome, especially the Y-chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA, seem to support a recent African origin.[40] Evidence from autosomal DNA also supports the recent African origin. The details of this great saga are not fully established yet, but by about 90,000 years ago they had moved into Eurasia and the Middle East. This was the area where Neanderthals, Homo neanderthalensis, had been living for a long time (at least 500,000 years in western Europe).

By about 42 to 44,000 years ago Homo sapiens had reached western Europe, including Britain.[41] In Europe and western Asia, Homo sapiens replaced the Neanderthals by about 35,000 years ago. The details of how this happened are not known.

At roughly the same time Homo sapiens arrived in Australia. Their arrival in the Americas was much later, about 15,000 years ago.[42] All these earlier groups of modern man were hunter-gatherers.

New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa

Homo sapiens have been on earth for 200,000 years — give or take a few ten-thousand-year stretches. Much of that time is shrouded in the fog of prehistory. What we do know has been pieced together by deciphering the fossil record through the principles of evolutionary theory. Yet new discoveries contain the potential to refashion that knowledge and lead scientists to new, previously unconsidered conclusions. A set of 8-million-year-old teeth may have done just that. Researchers recently inspected the upper and lower jaw of an ancient European ape. Their conclusions suggest that humanity’s forebearers may have arisen in Europe before migrating to Africa, potentially upending a scientific consensus that has stood since Darwin’s day. As reported in New Scientist, the 8- to 9-million-year-old hominin jaw bones were found at Nikiti, northern Greece, in the ’90s. Scientists originally pegged the chompers as belonging to a member of Ouranopithecus, an genus of extinct Eurasian ape. David Begun, an anthropologist at the University of Toronto, and his team recently reexamined the jaw bones. They argue that the original identification was incorrect. Based on the fossil’s hominin-like canines and premolar roots, they identify that the ape belongs to a previously unknown proto-hominin. The researchers hypothesize that these proto-hominins were the evolutionary ancestors of another European great ape Graecopithecus, which the same team tentatively identified as an early hominin in 2017. Graecopithecus lived in south-east Europe 7.2 million years ago. If the premise is correct, these hominins would have migrated to Africa 7 million years ago, after undergoing much of their evolutionary development in Europe. Begun points out that south-east Europe was once occupied by the ancestors of animals like the giraffe and rhino, too. “It’s widely agreed that this was the found fauna of most of what we see in Africa today,” he told New Scientists. “If the antelopes and giraffes could get into Africa 7 million years ago, why not the apes?” It’s worth noting that Begun has made similar hypotheses before. Writing for the Journal of Human Evolution in 2002, Begun and Elmar Heizmann of the Natural history Museum of Stuttgart discussed a great ape fossil found in Germany that they argued could be the ancestor (broadly speaking) of all living great apes and humans. “Found in Germany 20 years ago, this specimen is about 16.5 million years old, some 1.5 million years older than similar species from East Africa,” Begun said in a statement then. “It suggests that the great ape and human lineage first appeared in Eurasia and not Africa.”[43]

Petralona man

The Petralona man, or Archanthropus of Petralona, is a skull from 700,000 years ago in a cave in an area called Chalkidiki in Petralona, Northern Greece. Further excavations of the cave it was found discovered fossilized pieces of wood, an oak leaf, animal hair and coprolites, which enabled accurate dating. This is the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) of the age and has completely debunked the Out of Africa hoax. However the left wing scientific community has tried to suppress his research. Today a sign sits outside the cave of Petralona falsely stating that the skull found in the cave was 300,000 years old, and on Wikipedia today you will see zio-references dismissing the evidence and trying to date the Petralona skull within cultural marxist parameters – between 160,000 and 240,000 years old.[44]

Evolutionary explanations for skin color

In the same race females have somewhat lighter skin color than males. Skin color is thus one of the sexually differentiating characteristics. This may explain why (somewhat) whiter females are seen as more attractive as are (somewhat) darker males (if intelligence is controlled for).[45]

There are several theories regarding the evolutionary origins of the racial differences in skin color and facial features. One starts with the argument that survival in colder climate was more difficult which caused females to be more dependent on males for support than in warmer climates. Consequently, in colder climates there would be relatively more competition for males among females. This would favor the evolutionary development of characteristics which males would find preferable. This evolution would to some degree affect both sexes. In Europeans this is argued to have contributed to the development of whiter skin color and in East Asians to the development of more feminine facial features. The opposite is argued to have occurred in warmer climates.[45]

Another approach focuses on the health effect of skin color. Darker skin may protect against skin cancers from sunlight exposure, sunstroke, and folate degradation to toxic products due to ultraviolet radiation. These factors would favor a darker skin near the equator. On the other hand, vitamin D can be gained from food sources but is also metabolized in the skin with the help of sunlight. This process is helped by a lighter skin color. This could explain why populations generally have a lighter skin color the further they are from the equator. However, this does not explain why Europeans have whiter skins than other populations that live equally far from the equator. An explanation for this is that Europeans after the introduction of agriculture received relatively little vitamin D from animal food sources which would have made metabolism using sunlight more important. This theory would mean that the white skin of Europeans is a relatively new development that occurred after the introduction of agriculture in Europe. This is supported by research finding that the light skin of Europeans developed as short time as 3.000 to 12.000 years ago.[46]

Ultraviolate light destroys Folate (Vitamin B9) in the skin and plant products are high in Folate while fish and some animal products are high in Vitamin D. The East Asian and Eskimo/Inuit diets are traditionally high in fish, often sushi, which has more Vitamin D than cooked fish. Europe traditionally eating more plants has had more Folate.[47][48][49]

Species list

This list is in chronological order by genus.


  1. The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes
  2. Black Africans are Genetically Closer to Bonobos Than to White Humans, 2014
  3. Stringer, C.B. (1994). "Evolution of early humans", The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242. ISBN 978-0-521-32370-3.  Also ISBN 978-0-521-46786-5 (paperback)
  4. McHenry H.M (2009). "Human Evolution", Evolution: the first four billion years. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 265. ISBN 978-0-674-03175-3. 
  5. O'Neil, Dennis. Evolution's past is modern human's present. Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, San Marcos, California. Retrieved on September 2012.
  6. Shubin, Neil 2009. Your inner fish: the amazing discovery of our 375-million year-old ancestor. Penguin, London.
  7. Darwin, Charles (1861). On the Origin of Species, 3rd, John Murray, 488. 
  8. This is proved by DNA sequence analysis.
  9. For more details consult Human evolutionary genetics in enWP
  10. Hua Liu, et al. 2006. A geographically explicit genetic model of worldwide human-settlement history. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 79, 230–237.
  11. 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 Pough F.W. Janis C.M. & Heiser J.B. 2005. [1979]. Characteristics of primates. In Vertebrate life. 7th ed, Pearson p630.
  12. Soligo C. & Müller A.E. (1999). "Nails and claws in primate evolution". Journal of Human Evolution 36: 97–114. doi:10.1006/jhev.1998.0263.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Macdonald, David (2006). "Primates". The Encyclopedia of Mammals. Brown Reference. pp. 290–307. ISBN 0-681-45659-0. 
  14. phrase means something like: 'who is the leader may change according to the activity of the group'
  15. White T. & Kazlev A. (2006-01-08). Archonta: Primates. Palaeos. Retrieved on 2008-06-03.
  16. Price P.W. 1980. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton N.J.
  17. Holmes E.C. 2010. The gorilla connection. Nature 467, 404-5.
  18. Keefe B.E. et al 2006. Chimpanzee reservoirs of pandemic and non-pandemic HIV-1. Science 313, 523-526.
  19. Dart RA (1925). "The Man-Ape of South Africa". Nature 115: 195-199.
  20. The foramen magnum is where the spine joins the skull. In apes, the skull in life tilts forward, but in humans it is more evenly balanced on top of the spine. During human evolution, the position of the foramen magnum moved towards the middle underside the skull.
  21. Wood B (1996). "Human evolution". Bioessays 18 (12): 945-54. doi:10.1002/bies.950181204. PMID 8976151.
  22. Wood B (1992). "Origin and evolution of the genus Homo". Nature 355 (6363): 783-90. doi:10.1038/355783a0. PMID 1538759.
  23. Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ (2003). "Genera of the human lineage". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (13): 7684-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0832372100. PMID 12794185.
  24. Strait DS, Grine FE, Moniz MA (1997). "A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny". J. Hum. Evol. 32 (1): 17-82. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0097. PMID 9034954.
  25. Klein, Richard G. 2009. The human career: human biological and cultural origins. 3rd ed, Chicago.
  26. Hosfield R.T., Wenban-Smith F.F. & Pope M.I. 2009. Great prehistorians: 150 years of Palaeolithic research, 1859–2009. Lithics 30.
  27. Wood B (1999). "'Homo rudolfensis' Alexeev, 1986-fact or phantom?". J. Hum. Evol. 36 (1): 115-8. doi:10.1006/jhev.1998.0246. PMID 9924136.
  28. Gabounia L. et al (2002). "Discovery of a new hominid at Dmanisi (Transcaucasia, Georgia)". Comptes Rendus Palevol, 1 (4): 243-53. doi:10.1016/S1631-0683(02)00032-5.
  29. Lordkipanidze D. et al. (2006). "A fourth hominin skull from Dmanisi, Georgia". The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology 288 (11): 1146-57. doi:10.1002/ar.a.20379. PMID 17031841.
  30. Turner W (1895). "On M. Dubois' description of remains recently found in Java, named by him Pithecanthropus erectus: with remarks on so-called transitional forms between apes and man". Journal of Anatomy and Physiology 29 (Pt 3): 424–445. PMID 17232143.
  31. Spoor F, Wood B, Zonneveld F (1994). "Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal locomotion". Nature 369 (6482): 645–8. doi:10.1038/369645a0. PMID 8208290.
  32. Harvati K (2003). "The Neanderthal taxonomic position: models of intra- and inter-specific craniofacial variation". J. Hum. Evol. 44 (1): 107–132. PMID 12604307.
  33. Krings M. et al (1997). "Neanderthal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans". Cell 90 (1): 19–30. PMID 9230299.
  34. Serre D. et al (2004). "No evidence of Neanderthal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans". PLoS Biol. 2 (3): E57. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057. PMID 15024415.
  35. Dalton, Rex 2010. Fossil finger points to new human species. Nature 464, 472–3.
  36. Brown P. et al. (2004). "A new small-bodied hominin from the late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia". Nature 431 (7012): 1055–1061. doi:10.1038/nature02999. PMID 15514638.
  37. Argue D. et al (2006). "Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?". J. Hum. Evol. 51 (4): 360–374. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.013. PMID 16919706.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Martin R.D. et al (2006). "Flores hominid: new species or microcephalic dwarf?". The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology 288 (11): 1123–1145. doi:10.1002/ar.a.20389. PMID 17031806.
  39. Brumm, Adam et al 2010. Hominins on Flores, Indonesia, by one million years ago. Nature 464, 748–752.
  40. Jorde LB, Bamshad M, Rogers AR (1998). "Using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers to reconstruct human evolution". Bioessays 20 (2): 126–36. doi:<126::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-R 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199802)20:2<126::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-R. PMID 9631658.
  41. Amos, Jonathan 2011. BBC Science News [1]
  42. Fossil faeces is earliest evidence of North American humans.
  43. New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa, 2019
  45. 45.0 45.1 Michael B. Lewis. A Facial Attractiveness Account of Gender Asymmetries in Interracial Marriage. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2): e31703. Published online 2012 February 9.
  46. The evolution of different skin colours. Arnfinn Hykkerud Steindal and Johan Moan. Solar Radiation and Human Health. Espen Bjertness, editor. The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, 2008.
  47. More Than Skin Deep, Tanning Product of Sun's Rays. June 22, 2010
  48. Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin B9 (Folate)
  49. Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin D