User talk:Rauhreif

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome Rauhreif

Congratulations on the successful work at German Metapedia. You are certainly welcome to make improvements here. NatAll75 02:01, 25 February 2009 (CET)

I lifted the protection on the Hitler article so you could add the video links.NatAll75 03:21, 25 February 2009 (CET)
Thank you very much for your welcome. I will do my best if I can. But unfortunately my english is not very good. --Rauhreif 15:12, 26 February 2009 (CET)
I can not translate German, but if you have something from German Metapedia that you could put into English then place it on the discussion page and I will try to work it into the article. NatAll75 00:54, 27 February 2009 (CET)
Thats a good idea. Maybe I can insert or correct some pictures or videos. --Rauhreif 13:00, 27 February 2009 (CET)


Thank you very much for the confidence. I will do my best even though my english is not very good. As I said above I am able to do some little edits and help you if you are not very familiar with a special topic. Regards --Rauhreif 22:10, 27 February 2011 (CET)

English language

No hard feelings. Some of the topics which we approach are in any case ones which people are passionate over, so it is understandable. I think we're all standing on the same side of the trench here anyway. Regards, - Basileus 03:19, 27 March 2011 (CEST)

I’m not sure how you plan to use the phrase but this sounds proper to me: "The Wikipedia appears only." - NatAll75 01:48, 14 April 2011 (CEST)


Could you provide a proper article for the use of Silesian? This is in reference to the heritage of William Lonkowski. Thanks - NatAll75 03:03, 4 April 2011 (CEST)

I will try it. --Rauhreif 11:04, 4 April 2011 (CEST)
Thanks for the article. - NatAll75 00:29, 5 April 2011 (CEST)

Google’s bias against Metapedia

Could you explain Google’s censorship of Metapedia in Germany in this article? - NatAll75 10:52, 14 April 2011 (CEST)

Google explains it by itself: [1] The problem is, that germans not can use instead. If it is a german IP-address it falls back to the censored results. But google is as fair as it shows at the bottom of the page a hint that there are censored pages which are not visible. The other "search"-engines do not so. --Rauhreif 12:10, 14 April 2011 (CEST)

Hohenzollern, Prussia and Poland in German nationalism

I was just reading a book about the Teutonic Order and am curious about something, maybe you have a better understanding of it. Since the origins of the Duchy of Prussia is from the House of Hohenzollern taking over the Order State and making it a secular vassal of the Polish king, how do nationalists reconcile this contradiction with the high prestige Hohenzollern, above any other dynasty, is afforded in Germany? Even though the Habsburgs as leaders of the Holy Roman Empire continued to claim it as German against Poland during this time, compared to Hohenzollern they are only really given high respect in Austria (Ferdinand Gregorovius went as far as infamously attempting to fabricate a "Jewish" origin of them)? - Basileus 21:45, 21 April 2011 (CEST)

As far as I know the Order State has never been a vassal of Poland! :-) It depends by the Teutonic State anyhow. Poland has never been a cultured nation as it is claims currently. The problem is that Habsburg by no means was the leader of the Holy Roman Empire after 1806. Franz Joseph Karl von Habsburg-Lothringen had rejected the Crown in 1806 as Napoleon wanted. The Teutonic Order State has been a state as the Kingdom of Bavaria, Sachsonia or Austria as a german state as well. But it was never a part of the Holy Roman Empire. Thats the difference. Hohenzollern wanted to unite it. What ist the problem? In my mind the question is not if Prussia or Austria fails. The question must be that the german states has been in civil war for centuries to get the power. It is a very difficult problem. If I found some english literature I will tell you about it. The main problem was the war between Friedrich and Maria Theresia. Before was the "Pragmatische Sanktion" (I dont know the right word in english). The last possibility to unite the german states was the war of 1866. After Bismarck united the Reich, Austria was exluded because there were too many Non-german people in it. That was a right decision. But after the WW1 we wanted to establish a german Reich only with Germans in it, it has been forbidden by the allies. Adolf Hitler wants to correct that mistake but that Reich has been destroyed by the allies as well. Here we are. So we don not speak about history. We speak about the future of Germany and thus about the future of Europe and the white people all over the world. I hope that you understand my bad english. --Rauhreif 23:02, 21 April 2011 (CEST)
Ah I mean much earlier, when the Order State was first made into the Duchy of Prussia by Albert of Prussia (Hohenzollern) in 1525. When he did the "Prussian Homage" to the King of Poland. It seemed surprising to me when I first read about it, because of the long conflict between Germany and Poland since ancient times (I would have thought that would ruin the reputation of the dynasty from a later nationalist perspective). But the Holy Roman Emperors continued to claim overlordship against Poland in a titular way for some time after this. - Basileus 23:32, 21 April 2011 (CEST)
I do not quite understand, why you say "Ferdinand Gregorovius ... infamously attempting to fabricate a "Jewish" origin of them"?" Just look at their faces, their body, and you see, what they are. Facts are facts, there is nothing infamous in uncovering them.. Also consider the fact, that Jews very much liked to move into Habsburg areas. Galicia, Bukovina were full of them, and later unfortunately also Hungary and Austria. Why? I also suggest you to look at the present English royal family, Charles' appearance, or that his sons also speak books about their racial origin. Hu1 00:18, 22 April 2011 (CEST)


Yes I know about the agreement of Krakau. But the article is wrong. Have a look at the list of literature: Only poles! An accident? :-) Thats the reason why I write within the Metapedia and not within the Wikipedia. As the agreement says: It was a agreement and not a treaty. It can never be wrong to arrange good contracts for both sides which benefited both of them. Important is the treaty of Wehlau which follows. I am very open-minded to find out the truth. I do not want to lie as Jews or Poles do so. Only the truth is the step to freedom. We have to find out it. Thats the way why I am here. --Rauhreif 00:28, 22 April 2011 (CEST)

Talk:German Democratic Republic‎

Could you please help there? Hu1 22:45, 25 May 2011 (CEST)

Yes. I will have a look within the next few days. For the moment I will write a statement in brief at that page. --Rauhreif 00:16, 26 May 2011 (CEST)

Karl Hans Janke

I added a bit more to the article. However, I couldn’t find anything on him in English in Google books. An interesting fellow. - NatAll75 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Did you read these files?

There are some informations about him in english. --Rauhreif 12:53, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Paul Bang

Could you please help with improvements for the Paul Bang article? - NatAll75 22:19, 4 March 2014 (CET)

There are only a few information about him. It was a coincidence that I found anything about him because I looked for literature about the treaty of Versailles. --Rauhreif 22:25, 19 March 2014 (CET)

  • There is a mountain of literature and documentation published from the Versailles Treaty. Greg Frost 20:31, 15 May 2014 (CEST)

Maybe but not about Paul Bang. --Rauhreif 19:21, 23 May 2014 (CEST)

Bilder in der deutschen Sektion

[2] <--- Bitte durchlesen und falls möglich, helfen. Danke. Hu1 10:28, 31 March 2014 (CEST)

links between the German and English language sections

Rauhreif, I noticed some missing links from the German language section to the English section:

(Galileo 08:12, 2 April 2014 (CEST)).

Done. --Rauhreif 12:18, 17 April 2014 (CEST)

Antifa in Germany

I am trying to make a list of all the Antifa terrorist groups in Europe, but the situation in Germany is very confusing. The Antifaschistische Aktion/Bundesweite Organisation apparently existed from 1992 to 2001, but then split because of the Pro-Israel vs. Pro-Palestine issue. But then I can only track down various groups in Berlin, Hannover and Göttingen. Why only these three places? Don't Antifa exist in the south and the West? Basileus 17:29, 30 June 2014 (CEST)

The whole political establishment in the FRG is infiltrated by the antifa nowadays. There are several groups though but there is no need to establish it officially. Hope you understand my statement. --Rauhreif 14:02, 1 March 2015 (CET)