Metapedia:Featured article nominations

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured Article.png

On this page we determine which articles are to become featured articles. The featured articles represent Metapedia's very best work and satisfy the featured article criteria. All editors are welcome to review and comment on nominations.

When an article after review and voting has been deemed qualified for a featured article classification, insert {{featured}} in the article, to properly mark and categorize it as featured.

Nomination procedure

  • Carefully read through the criteria in Metapedia:Featured articles and consider if the article you intend to nominate is living up to the requirements.
  • Paste the text below under the header Nominations on this page and fill in the name of the article together with the reason why you think it deserves to become a featured article.
==== [[Name of article goes here]] ====
* Nominated by ~~~~
* Reason: (Provide reason for nomination here.)

'''Supports'''

'''Opposes'''

'''Discussion'''

----

Rules for nominating and voting

  • The user who nominates an article cannot participate in the voting.
  • Provide a detailed explanation for the nomination.
  • To support a nomination, put your signature on a separate line below Supports, followed by your reason(s), which should be based on a full reading of the text. If you have been a significant contributor to the article before its nomination, please indicate this.
  • To oppose a nomination, put your signature on a separate line below Opposes, followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with ... ) rather than removing it.
  • If a nominator feels that an Oppose has been addressed, they should say so after the reviewer's signature rather than striking out or splitting up the reviewer's text.
  • If you want to provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write a comment below Discussion followed by your advice.


  • A nominated article becomes a featured article if...
    • ...it has been nominated in at least four weeks and
    • ...has received at least three supporting votes and
    • ...these constitute at least 50 % of the total number of votes or
    • ...that it after two weeks has received only and at least ten supporting votes.

Nominations


Why We Fight

  • Nominated by User:Faustus 08:51, 22 July 2011 (CET)
  • Reason: Rather extensive book-article on one of the most important weapons we have.

Supports

  • High-quality article on one of the prime books of the ENR-thinkthank that has basically spawned Metapedia.--Faustus 08:52, 22 July 2011 (CEST)

Opposes

  • The article on Guillaume Faye suggests that he has developed over time a “pro-Zionist attitude” in his opposition to the Islamic incursion into Europe. - NatAll75 10:13, 8 March 2013 (CET)


Discussion



Elsa Brändström

  • Nominated by Crusader 02:39, 6 February 2013 (CET)
  • Reason: This Lady must not be forgotten!

Supports

  • Uses significant Wikipedia text, but is far better, and has been used to improve And expand its article. One passage at the end of the "World War I" section remains unclear, though. Julius A 08:59, 8 March 2013 (CET)
  • Agreed - NatAll75 10:05, 8 March 2013 (CET)
  • By the way, vast parts of the Wikipedia text was also written by myself! -- Crusader 12:41, 14 March 2013 (CET)
  • It was already at main page on the portuguese version. --MCMLXXXII 19:50, 30 June 2013 (CEST)

Opposes

Discussion



Race realism

  • Nominated by - NatAll75 03:26, 14 March 2013 (CET)
  • Reason: Well developed article

Supports

  • Very well written. --Crusader 12:43, 14 March 2013 (CET)
  • Same as above. Atlantid 13:39, 14 March 2013 (CET)

Opposes

Discussion

  • Both the realism and denialism pages are good. I will be working on the Ahnenerbe page in full next when I get the time. Other who helped on the realism page were NatAll75, and Mikemikev - so they also deserve credit. Atlantid 13:38, 14 March 2013 (CET)
    • That races exist is no surprise, so the existence of "race realists" is no surprise. And indeed the article gives a long list of "race realists". The existence of race denial is much more remarkable. That's what makes the race denialism article more suitable as a featured article. (Galileo 14:13, 14 March 2013 (CET)).
      • The listed race realists are scientists or academics only. Scientists that believe in race are a minority in the West (though they are still present as shown); the last poll in America conducted in 1999 showed 69% of physical anthropologists denied race. However in places Like China, India, or Poland, race realism is the majority viewpoint. The main reason for this contrast, is down to political correctness (which is essentially Western) as Richard Lynn, and others have shown. In fact there was a study showing 100% of Chinese physical anthropologists believe in race. So its not as if race denialism even exists in the Far East, its completely absent. A 2003 study put Polish anthropologists who denied race at only 25%. So the existence of race denial is remarkable in the East, or anywhere outside of the West (excluding Eastern Europe), while the mainstream viewpoint in the West. However in regards to the latter, there are certain reversed trends. Biologists and anatomists are split 50/50. Atlantid
        • Academic intitutes in the West have unfortunately been distorted into bulwarks of multiculturalism/multiracialism/deracination. That a majority of "scientists" employed at such bulwarks support race denialism is an interesting fact to stress (for example by making race denialism a featured article). That's why I think it is better to make the race denial article featured. But it depends on the readership we aim at (general readers or academic people only). I think we should aim at the general reader (and not only at academic people - who by the way should read the race realism article-), because I don't think we can change the "viewpoints" of race-denying academics who are deliberately denying race for career purposes or ideological purposes. Exposing to the general public the massive race-does-not-exist hoax in the Western academic world is much more important in my view. (Galileo 16:06, 14 March 2013 (CET)).


Race denialism

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by Galileo - NatAll75 16:21, 14 March 2013 (CET)
  • Reason:

Supports

  • Hu1 23:44, 22 June 2013 (CEST)

Opposes

Discussion



White Mexican

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by NatAll75 23:15, 22 June 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: Few Americans know there are White Mexicans

Supports

  • Hu1 23:44, 22 June 2013 (CEST)
  • Support. We should draw attention to this important fact (Galileo 21:24, 30 September 2013 (CEST)).
  • Important article. There are a lot of red links, but I'll consider it feature ready when the example persons have articles written for them--especially the hottie Barbara Mori, who will enamor readers with her European beauty. Julius A 00:01, 7 January 2014 (CET)

Opposes

  • The number of 18 million is way far than the real number. --MCMLXXXII 19:46, 30 June 2013 (CEST)

Discussion



Gaza flotilla massacre

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by NatAll75 10:27, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: Zionists are attempting to distort the facts and rewrite history concerning this massacre as indicated with the video I recently added to the article. We need to promote this article.

Supports

  • Looks promising but first it needs many more pictures. --A Wyatt Man 10:54, 25 June 2013 (CEST)
  • Support. We should expose these Zionist criminals. (Galileo 21:24, 30 September 2013 (CEST)).

Opposes

Discussion



Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950)

  • Nominated by MCMLXXXII 19:48, 30 June 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: Article is good and important for the project.

Supports

Opposes

Discussion

  • The article says at the top it contains text copied from Wikipedia. I checked and Wikipedia has something that looks about the same. I checked the talk page and Wikipedia never featured it. A Wyatt Man 20:00, 30 June 2013 (CEST)
It need to be reviwed and take out the wikipedia thing, but the article is one of the most important of all the project. --MCMLXXXII 20:05, 30 June 2013 (CEST)


The Skunk

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by A Wyatt Man 03:39, 1 July 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: It seems like a decent and well developed article.

Supports

  • Support. We should expose these Zionist criminals. (Galileo 21:24, 30 September 2013 (CEST)).

Opposes

Discussion



Swastika vandalism

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by A Wyatt Man 19:34, 1 July 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: Firstly it's a good political article for the site. Secondly, it's just really funny seeing they all turn out to be jews doing it.

Supports

  • Support. It is shocking that most "antisemitism" and "racism" is actually done by Jews themselves, but blamed by them on non-Jews, so they can create sympathy for themselves. For example, the The first racist murder in the Netherlands "since WWII" was committed by a "neonazi" who in fact was a Jew as was admitted in a tiny newspaper article many years after the murder. In the meantime, the zionist propaganda machine used this murder to depict people with anti-immigration views as evil "neonazis" who want to "kill six million Jews". (Galileo 21:24, 30 September 2013 (CEST)).

Opposes

Discussion



How Einstein ruined physics

  • Nominated by - this article has been nonimated by A Wyatt Man 14:23, 29 September 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: This article looks really good. It also challenges scientific ideas when most articles here just challenge political ideas.

Supports

  • Support. Because of Einstein we are back in the dark ages, scientifically speaking. Straight lines are not straight anymore and curved lines have become straight. The earth does not revolve around the sun anymore, because it all depends on your point of view and seen from the earth it is the sun that revolves around the earth.(Galileo 21:24, 30 September 2013 (CEST))
  • Support. Einstein is a damaging figure. Hu1 23:40, 10 October 2013 (CEST)

Opposes

Discussion



Gorla Massacre

  • Nominated by MCMLXXXII 21:40, 10 October 2013 (CEST)
  • Reason: I have a personal wish to see this article at main page on the 20 of October. I know it is small but is the ONLY article in english (even wikipedia have it only in Italian) on the internet and the ZOG Italian government tried for long to hide all crimes the allied invaders did on our territory. --MCMLXXXII 21:40, 10 October 2013 (CEST)

Supports

  • Support. Zog activity needs publicity. Hu1 23:40, 10 October 2013 (CEST)
  • Support. I added more links to the article too. A Wyatt Man 09:01, 11 October 2013 (CEST)

Opposes

Discussion




Fiveish

Supports

  • Support. It is good that we criticize this shameless Jewish money-worship. (Galileo 11:01, 2 July 2014 (CEST)).

Opposes

Discussion




  • Nominated by A Wyatt Man 06:17, 26 September 2014 (CEST)
  • Reason: I didn't know how it was going to end up when I was making it, but I think it turned out really well. This is a topic even Wikipedia doesn't cover. So much of what the most people think are legitimate protests are just fake. A Wyatt Man 06:17, 26 September 2014 (CEST)

Supports

Opposes

Discussion




Finished votes