Cultural Struggle
The defence and creative assertion of threatened European cultures.
Political struggle is sterile without a cultural struggle to support, accompany, and justify it. A dynamic, identitarian culture, buttressed by its native biological stock, is essential to the survival of a people or a civilisation. All political movements neglecting cultural struggle, all states rejecting a policy of cultural identity, operate in a void.
Cultural struggle is not restricted to the defence of the patrimony, the maintenance of tradition, or dialogue with the historical memory — it’s also creative. For it’s not enough to denounce the destruction of European culture in order to save it — we need a counter-offensive.
To this end, cultural struggle needs to address: Americanisation, Islamisation, Africanisation, as well as society’s present neo-primitivism. Cultural struggle is polymorphic, both defensive and offensive. It involves the school, no less than the plastic arts, music, audio/visual, language, literature, etc. It must reject both cosmopolitanism and antiquarianism. With the present censorship and subversion, cultural struggle has a vested interest in attack and imagination, as it continues to transmit the common heritage.
Cultural struggle also resists the substitution of memory (to which Europeans have been victim) and the effort to make alien cultures preferable to our native culture; it resists replacing pride with guilt and repentance, and resists all effort to make ethnopluralism (which demotes the significance of European culture) everywhere hegemonic.
At the same time, it’s necessary to beware of pseudo-identitarians, the system’s secret collaborators and hirelings, who endlessly profess their admiration for ‘all the cultures of the world’, even those hostile to us and seeking the destruction of our culture.
Cultural struggle doesn’t entail defending all cultures, only European culture, which it assumes is superior to other cultures.
