Einheitsmensch

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The forced conformity to a racially, culturally, psychologically and politically standardized citizen is a crime against humanity. In the 21st century, warning against the Einheitsmensch and defending ethnopluralism, especially by inegalitarians, is sometimes seen as reactionary, even nationalistic or "racist" and often considered a "conspiracy theory".

Einheitsmensch (English: uniform man or mankind) is the German term for (excluding the biased terman subhuman) the radical opposite to Nietzsche's Übermensch. The egalitarian nightmare calls for the eradication of all races, cultures and human differences in favor of an easily controlled and indoctrinated uniformity of cultural and political context globally. A standardized humanity without a community of values thriving on it's diversity is just as doomed as a standardized curriculum in the school systems of the world. Enriching dissimilarity is not the same as inequality, individualism of man, with all it's faults, must not be reduced to standardized subjects or clones.

Definition

The protagonists of children's and young people's literature from the GDR, which was dictated by the Soviet Union, are also inglorious role models of human conformity, who preferred to portray communist-influenced uniformed people, loyal to the socialist post-war society, instead of propagating the development of an independent, critical identity.

The planned forced racialization is intended to achieve species-biological synchronization and the eradication of races against the natural order. Mass and poverty immigration goes back to the delusion of global and European socialists of the New World Order (NWO) of the creation of a “new person” and the abolition of identity or tribal society.

At its core, forced conformity stifles individual expression and hinders personal growth. When individuals are compelled to conform to a particular set of beliefs or behaviors, they may suppress their unique perspectives and talents. This suppression not only limits personal expression but also diminishes the richness of many contributions. Creativity, innovation, and progress thrive in environments that allow individuals to speak freely without judgment, condemnation, or the threat of being ostracized from a group or even canceled. [...] We must have critical thinking and many voices to be able to solve complex social challenges. Diversity of thought and experience are essential for addressing complex issues and adapting to changing circumstances. On a personal level, the psychological impact of forced conformity is profound. When individuals are compelled to conform due to a mob mentality, it can lead to feelings of alienation, anxiety, and frustration. The suppression of thought makes one question oneself and their intellect.[1]

The uniform army of racially and gender-same people would mean an extinction of human cultures and a negation of human strength through ancestry diversity, although advocates believe that the brainless and driveless masses could be better managed and monitored, similar to the scourging of the European economy by the European single currency introduced against the peoples. The idea of ​​the absolute equality of humans, which has today become a socio-pathological ideology in our society by absolutizing the demands of the French Revolution, is not only politically unrealistic, but it is also eminently unbiological and stands in the way of human evolution directly in the way of the individual.

A whole host of globalist social techniques are in use to eliminate the intermediary bodies that currently provide cultural, spiritual, traditional, legal and identity protection. The realized unified human being, who then lives effectively stateless, is only faced with global corporations that enforce the legal system (created solely for them) like their house rules using armies of employed lawyers. The university-factory is also increasingly a monstrous machine, in which initially different and diverse students are turned into uniform people and made fit for exploitation in a uniform society.

Let us finally recognize again what biology and common sense tell us: that people are not equal, that there are natural differences in rank and that we desperately need the performance of the highly gifted, the elite, if the world crises of the turn of the century are to be overcome. Let us defend ourselves against the 'uniform man', as certain ideologies preach, against the inhuman 'force to be the same', against the extinction of personality, against massification. In the name of freedom: Vive la difference![2]

Political Correctness is a threat to a politically free state, because at the end it will produce the state of mass conformity, the "Thought Supervision" state.

Quotes

  • "The undoubted ethical truth that all people have the right to equal opportunities of development is becoming twisted in our time to the untruth that all people potentially are equivalent."Konrad Lorenz, Nobel laureate
  • "This ideology of equality (or egalitarianism), although in conflict with science and common sense, has various, but found powerful advocates – namely everyone who is interested in the 'creation' of the unified human being: aggressive left-wing and reactionary ideologues as well administrations and the consumer economy. The artificial egalitarianism is on full display. it has penetrated and influenced our thinking with it's phraseology and has already changed our society in a frightening way. [...] The prosecution calls modern egalitarianism an attack on freedom and human dignity and exposes the increasing “force to be equal” as intolerant and devoid of any love for humanity. The same-making is accused of intentionally or negligently causing a kind of “heat death” of humanity, at which (according to the physical analogy of temperature compensation), after disappearance of all differences, everything petrifies into uniform motionlessness. [...] It was the creative achievement of the highly gifted that has brought about all human progress in the past and must achieve it in the future – while the egalitarians want to squeeze everything into a sterile corset of mediocrity. The creative coexistence of many clearly different nations once made the continent of Europe the avantgarde of humanity – while the egalitarians intend to level out all national peculiarities."Pierre Krebs[3]
  • “In one case, humanity is the sum of all individuals, represented equally in every particular human being: one is first of all 'human' and only secondarily, as if by chance, a member of a particular culture or people. In the other case, humanity is only the totality of cultures and ethnic communities: the individual is determined only by his organic membership to it. […] In our opinion, the individual exists only in connection with the communities in which he is included (and in relation to which he stands out as an individual). Every individual activity represents an act of participation in the life of a people. The interest of the individual is not valued 'in and of itself'.”Alain de Benoist[4]
  • “The standardized, unified human being, detached from this substructure and locked in a standardized, unified world, blind to his perspective and soul, falls prey to the actual and most dangerous prejudice of the European crisis. It is the deadly belief that, in the shell of total domestication, we can detach ourselves as a unified human being from the natural and cultural bonds of the older layers of our existence." — Lothar Penz, 2011

See also

Further reading

External links

References

  1. FOR THE LOVE OF RELATIONSHIPS — Forced conformity
  2. Pierre Krebs: Das unvergängliche Erbe – Alternativen zum Prinzip der Gleichheit, 1981, p. 7
  3. Das unvergängliche Erbe – Alternativen zum Prinzip der Gleichheit (blurb), 1981
  4. Kulturrevolution von rechts. Gramsci und die Nouvelle Droite. Krefeld 1985, p. 133