House of Lords

From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
House of Lords.jpg

The House of Lords (also known as the House of Peers) is the Upper House of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and is also commonly referred to as "The Lords". The UK Parliament comprises the Monarch, The Lords, and the House of Commons which is the lower house and referred to as "The Commons".

Traditional House

Membership of the House of Lords was until 1999 a hereditary right for Peers of the Realm, the traditional British aristocracy, dating uninterruptedly back to the Norman Conquest. Even the Anglo-Saxons had a similar assembly, the Witenagemot, or Witan, comprising the wise men of the kingdom, usually a mixture of prelates and clergy, sometimes described as "the King's friends and dependents.". The Normans replaced this with a curia or concilium of Barons. Qualification was replaced by tenure.[1] The most authoritative and biographical examination of the hereditary peers throughout this period is The Complete Peerage[2].

History

Reforms

The Liberal Party's governments of the three decades before The Great War worked diligently against the aristocracy and the House of Lords with a series of what they termed "reforms", designed to remove the perceived power of the aristocracy in the counties and judiciary, and undermine The House of Lords, to remove its power and further attack the hereditary aristocracy in general.[3] This would remove also the traditional balance in the British parliament. The most serious of these was the 1911 Parliament Act, by the Liberal Party, followed by the post-World War II Parliament Act of the Labour Party.

Lord Sudeley's 2018 book

The Conservative Party, not to be left behind in this Left-wing crusade, introduced the Life Peerages Act 1958 to bring more ordinary people from different professions, and more women, into The Lords. Before the Act, the House of Lords had been made up exclusively of hereditary Peers. A Life Peer cannot pass their title on to his or her children nor are the latter entitled to be called 'The Honourable'. Although Life Peers are supposedly appointed by the Crown, it is the Prime Minister who nominates them. By convention the Leader of the Opposition and other party leaders may also propose a certain number.[4] This has resulted in spivs such as the infamous Doreen Lawrence and the homosexual Muslim Waheed Alli (both Labour nominations), and other totally unqualified party appointments making a mockery of the Peerage.

Liberals (in both the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party) and socialists continued to attack the Upper House with demands for further "reform"[5][6], while others, notably the hereditary Peer Lord Sudeley, wrote extensively against it.[7][8][9][10]

Worse was to come. The Labour Party under Tony Blair, in an act of Class War[11], expelled all but 92 of the hereditary Peerage in 1999.[12][13] The debate had raged prior to that, with Labour continuing to call for anything up to complete abolition. However, No.10 Downing Street stated in June 1991 that the House of Lords "does work quite well. It would be difficult to justify a second chamber constituted like the Commons......the Prime Minister does not foresee the government having plans to alter either the composition or the power of the House of Lords."[14] But by the late 1990s the now confused and liberal fake Conservative Party failed to support The Lords. Traditional Tory Member of Parliament and former Government Minister Alan Clark condemned his party, and described the "reforms" as "monstrous", with another Conservative M.P., Dr. Liam Fox declaring it was "the greatest act of betrayal in the history of the Tory party".[15] By 2002 the Conservative Party were even proposing that 80% of Peers be elected.[16] The House of Lords now consists almost entirely of appointed members, who are Life Peers, apart from the remaining 92 hereditaries.[17]

Fringe political pressure groups, such as the Traditional Britain Group, and some hereditary peers, continue to call for the repeal of Blair's legislation and the restoration of the pre-1999 status quo.

References

  1. Round, J.Horace, M.A., LL.D., The Origin of the House of Lords', in "Peerage and Pedigree", London, 1910, pps:324-362.
  2. Cockayne G.E., with several expert editors, The Complete Peerage, vols. 1 to 13, London, 1910 - 1959.
  3. Phillips, Gregory D., The Diehards - Aristocratic Society and Politics in Edwardian England, Harvard University Press, & London, 1979.
  4. https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/life-peers/
  5. Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson in 1969.
  6. Wyndham, William, Peers in Parliament Reformed, London, 1998, ISBN: 1-899163-43-3
  7. Sudeley, The Lord, "The Role of Heredity in Politics" in Monday World magazine, Winter, 1971/72.
  8. Sudeley, The Lord, Lords Reform - Why Tamper with the House of Lords, A Conservative Monday Club Policy Paper, December 1979.
  9. Sudeley, The Lord, The Preservation of the House of Lords, A Monday Club booklet, London, 1991.
  10. Sudeley, The Lord, Peers through the mists of time, Diehard Books, London, 2018, ISBN: 978-164316003-0
  11. The Times newspaper, December 31, 1996, p.4.
  12. Mitchell, Austin, Farewell My Lords, London, 1999, ISBN: 1902301439
  13. Sutherland, Keith, editor, The Rape of the Constitution, Imprint Academic, UK, 2000, ISBN: 0-907845-70-3
  14. Letter from the Prime Minister's Office to Dr. Mark Mayall, Chairman of the Conservative Monday Club, dated 17th June 1991.
  15. Clark, Alan, and Trewin, Ion, editor, The Last Diaries, London, 2002, p.280-1.
  16. The Daily Telegraph, January 10, 2002, p.8.
  17. http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/lords/composition-of-the-lords/